Retention of the Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1: Multicenter Study Results – Corrected Proof
Objective:
To report the retention rate of the Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 and to identify risk factors for keratoprosthesis loss.
Design:
Cohort study.
Participants:
A total of 300 eyes of 300 patients who underwent implantation of the Boston keratoprosthesis type I device between January 2003 and July 2008 by 19 surgeons at 18 medical centers.
Methods:
Forms reporting preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters were prospectively collected and subsequently analyzed at a central data collection site.
Main Outcome Measures:
Keratoprosthesis retention.
Results:
A total cumulative number of 422 life-years of device implantation are included in this analysis. The average duration of follow-up was 17.1±14.8 months, with a range of 1 week to >6.1 years. Ninety-three percent of the 300 Boston keratoprosthesis implants were retained at their last follow-up, corresponding to a retention time of 396 patient-years or 1.42 years/keratoprosthesis. The probability of retention after 1 year and 2 years was 94% and 89%, respectively. During the study period, 21 (7%) eyes failed to retain the device; the reasons for keratoprosthesis loss include sterile keratolysis (9), fungal infections (8), dense retroprosthetic membranes (3), and bacterial endophthalmitis (1). Multivariate analysis demonstrated 3 independent risk factors for keratoprosthesis loss: autoimmune cause (hazard ratio [HR], 11.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.31–43.11), ocular surface exposure requiring a concomitant tarsorrhaphy (HR, 3.43; 95% CI, 1.05–11.22), and number of prior failed penetrating keratoplasties (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.18–2.28).
Conclusions:
The Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 seems to be a viable option for eyes that are not candidates for penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Ocular surface disease due to an autoimmune cause demonstrated the lowest retention rate.
Financial Disclosure(s):
The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.