Comparison of Wide-Field Fluorescein Angiography and Nine-Field Montage Angiography in Uveitis – Accepted Manuscript

Abstract: Purpose: To qualitatively and quantitatively compare Optos© fundus camera fluorescein angiographic images of retinal vascular leakage with 9-field montage Topcon© fluorescein angiography (FA) images in patients with uveitis. We hypothesized that Optos images reveal more leakage in uveitis patients.Design: Retrospective, observational case series.Methods: Images of all uveitis patients imaged with same-sitting Optos FA and 9-field montage FA during a 9 month period at a single institution (52 eyes of 31 patients) were graded for the total area of retinal vascular leakage. The main outcome measure was area of fluorescein leakage.Results: The area of apparent FA leakage was greater in Optos images than in 9-field montage images (median 22.5 mm2 vs. 4.8 mm2, P<0.0001). Twenty-two of 49 (45%) eyes with gradable photos had at least 25% more leakage on the Optos image than on the montage image. Two (4.1%) had at least 25% less leakage on Optos, and 25 (51%) were similar between the two modalities. Two eyes had no apparent retinal vascular leakage on 9-field montage but were found to have apparent leakage on Optos images. Twenty-three of the 49 eyes had posterior pole leakage, and of these 17 (73.9%) showed more posterior pole leakage on the Optos image. A single 200 degree Optos FA image captured a mean 1.50x the area captured by montage photography.Conclusion: More retinal vascular pathology, both in the periphery and the posterior pole, is seen with Optos FA in uveitis patients when compared with 9-field montage. The clinical implications of Optos FA findings have yet to be determined.