Category: Peer-reviewed

Author reply

We thank Dr Fraunfelder for his comments and discussion of cryotherapy as an adjunctive treatment for pterygia. Based on the established requirements of an Ophthalmic Technology Assessment Committee (OTAC) publication, we were unable to include the top…

Reply

We appreciate the comments of García-González and Teus on our article. In the study cohort, less than 17% of the patients were dissatisfied with the outcome. It is to be noticed that the Parinaud (p) scale is a measurement at 33 cm (not at 35 cm as…

Leprosy and the Germ Theory

The germ theory of disease, one of the great accomplishments of science, was not established for two centuries after Anton van Leeuenhoek in 1674 saw microscopic, motile “animalcules” in stagnant pond water. These were relatively large single-celle…

This Issue At A Glance

Tozer et al (p. 2029) evaluated the effectiveness of rescue therapy in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) that failed monotherapy with intravitreal injections of bevacizumab or ranibizumab. They found that the combination of …

Reply

Thank you very much, Dr. Khawaja Khalid Shoaib, for your interest in our article, Posterior Iris-claw Aphakic Intraocular Lens Implantation in Children. We agree with Dr. Shoaib regarding the rather short 31-month average follow-up in our study. The…

Author reply

Dear Editor: We thank Drs Bateman and Silva for their comments. We share their belief in the importance of genetic counseling and written documentation when caring for families affected with genetic diseases, which is why we included genetic counseli…

A Simple Vista en Este Número

Tozer y otros (p. 2029) evaluaron la efectividad de la terapia de rescate en ojos con degeneración macular neovascular relacionada con la edad (AMD) que no respondía a la monoterapia con inyecciones de bevacizumab o ranibizumab a intervalos. Determin…

期刊一览

Tozer (p. 2029) 等人评估了新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性 (AMD) 患眼行补救治疗的有效性,这些患眼行单药治疗(玻璃体腔注射贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗)失败。他们发现,联合光动力治疗(PDT)及抗

Erratum

With apologies from the editorial office, the Correspondence entitled, “Gene Expression Profiling vs. TNM Classification,” which printed in the May 2013 issue (Ophthalmology 2013;120:1109) erroneously included a statement that the authors of the or…

Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection for Macular Edema Resulting from Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: One-Year Results of the Phase 3 GALILEO Study – Corrected Proof

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept injections for treatment of macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).Design: A randomized, multicenter, double-masked phase 3 study.Participants: A total of 177 treatment-naive patients with macular edema secondary to CRVO were randomized in a 3:2 ratio.Methods: Patients received either 2-mg intravitreal aflibercept or sham injections every 4 weeks for 20 weeks. From week 24 to 48, the aflibercept group received aflibercept as needed (pro re nata [PRN]), and the sham group continued receiving sham injections.Main Outcome Measures: The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients who gained 15 letters or more in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 24. This study reports week 52 results including the proportion of patients who gained 15 letters or more in BCVA and the mean change from baseline BCVA and central retinal thickness. Efficacy end points at week 52 were all exploratory.Results: At week 52, the mean percentage of patients gaining 15 letters or more was 60.2% in the aflibercept group and 32.4% in the sham group (P = 0.0004). Aflibercept patients, compared with sham patients, had a significantly higher mean improvement in BCVA (+16.9 letters vs. +3.8 letters, respectively) and reduction in central retinal thickness (−423.5 μm vs. −219.3 μm, respectively) at week 52 (P < 0.0001 for both). Aflibercept patients received a mean of 2.5 injections (standard deviation, 1.7 injections) during PRN dosing. The most common ocular adverse events in the aflibercept group were related to the injection procedure or the underlying disease, and included macular edema (33.7%), increased intraocular pressure (17.3%), and eye pain (14.4%).Conclusions: Treatment with intravitreal aflibercept provided significant functional and anatomic benefits after 52 weeks as compared with sham. The improvements achieved after 6 monthly doses at week 24 largely were maintained until week 52 with as-needed dosing. Intravitreal aflibercept generally was well tolerated.Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.